Skip to content
Sudonix

NodeBB v3 Chat Very Slow

Moved Performance

  • Pandaundefined

    Custom html in nodebb to prevent cache

    Unsolved Configure
    18
    2 Votes
    18 Posts
    485 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda You’ll need to do that with js. With some quick CSS changes, it looks like this

    d619844f-fbfe-4cf1-a283-6b7364f6bf18-image.png

    The colour choice is still really hard on the eye, but at least you can now read the text

  • DownPWundefined

    NodeBB socket with CloudFlare

    Unsolved Performance
    23
    1 Votes
    23 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW it’s your only realistic option at this stage.

  • DownPWundefined

    error with v3 in browser console

    Solved Performance
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    168 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW it’s in relation to the response I provided above

  • Pandaundefined

    SEO and Nodebb

    Performance
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    148 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example

    https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1

    However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts

    https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365

    And also

    https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164

    It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”.

    Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.

  • Pandaundefined

    Smart Widgets

    Solved Configure
    9
    3 Votes
    9 Posts
    317 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda said in Smart Widgets:

    So why is that, or conversely why would the function to expose username ever be required, as it seems app.user is already an available global object?

    It is, yes, but not if you are using it outside of a widget. The function I wrote is also historical and comes from the 2.x train 🙂

  • phenomlabundefined

    Optimum config for NodeBB under NGINX

    Performance
    4
    3 Votes
    4 Posts
    613 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @crazycells hi - no security reason, or anything specific in this case. However, the nginx.conf I posted was from my Dev environment which uses this port as a way of not interfering with production.

    And yes, I use clustering on this site with three instances.

  • crazycellsundefined

    optional "snow falling" theme

    Solved Customisation
    6
    6 Votes
    6 Posts
    286 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Sala ok, but that’s still the same loop which is going to have an impact on the CPU.

  • DownPWundefined

    NodeBB 1.19.3

    Solved Performance
    33
    4 Votes
    33 Posts
    3k Views
    DownPWundefined

    @phenomlab

    I find the problem Mark 😉

    The error message indicated this path :

    http://localhost:4567/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/styles.css?v=6983dobg16u

    I change the path url on config.json

    47bacc80-f141-41e4-a261-3f8d650cc6f6-image.png

    And all it’s good 🙂

    Weird, I didn’t have to change that path before 1.19.3

    But this does not prevent the problem from a clean install with Emoji Plugin

    EDIT: After test, that resolv the problem installation for 1.18.x but not for 1.19.x (I have other error message when I run ./nodebb Setup

    For resume: NodeJS 16_x with 1.18.x is ok