Skip to content

[NODEBB] Reply Button/arrow answer

Solved Customisation

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice gesture, and a great way to show your appreciation 💗

  • Nodebb 3.2.0

    Bugs
    20
    2 Votes
    20 Posts
    476 Views

    @crazycells yes, I’m aware of that. Need to fix

    EDIT- fixed. Caused by the same CSS that is used to absolutely position the “verified” group badge in the posts view. Amended this CSS so that is specifically targets the post stream as below

    li[component="post"] a[href*="/groups/verified"] { position: absolute !important; left: 8px; z-index: 2; margin-top: 1px; border-radius: 999px !important; line-height: 14px; display: block; height: 22px; margin-left: 0px !important; }
  • 3 Votes
    16 Posts
    490 Views

    @phenomlab
    Ah, got it working!
    I reversed the CSS addition to put z index high, and then I could see another error box saying fork title must be at least 3 characters.
    So made the new fork title longer and button responded.

  • 5 Votes
    16 Posts
    417 Views

    @DownPW Yes, it is. It’s set far too low meaning other elements with a higher preference will sit over the top of it.

  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    194 Views

    @Panda as, yes, now I understand and that makes 100% sense. It means those who get down voted can still have an opinion and use common services.

    And yes, you’re right. Rather than down vote, just ignore if you don’t agree.

  • 3 Votes
    7 Posts
    557 Views

    @crazycells pleasure. Using percentages makes much more sense in this case. It’s the same argument with px vs pt vs em with fonts, margins, padding, etc., in the sense that em is generally preferred over px and pt

    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/609517/why-em-instead-of-px

  • 9 Votes
    32 Posts
    3k Views

    @DownPW said in Bottom footer navbar button extend:

    Oh my god, it’s beautiful mark

    I liked this design so much, I’ve implemented it here. I intend to do a lot more with the footer in due course, so hiding it makes a lot of sense. Thanks @DownPW for the idea and initial concept ♥

  • 9 Votes
    20 Posts
    911 Views

    @crazycells Yeah, looking at the plugin itself, that’s a hard coded limit

    3d6dbc10-185b-4102-9470-0c2731a10750-image.png

    I’ll probably remove that… eventually…

  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    804 Views

    @downpw I’m inclined to agree with this. There isn’t much else you can do, and provided it works with no odd looking artefacts in other browsers, then ok. The :before and :after are pseudo classes and very well supported across all browsers (except perhaps Internet Exploder, but who uses that these days ?)