Skip to content
Sudonix

NodeBB v3 Chat Very Slow

Moved Performance

  • DownPWundefined

    NodeBB socket with CloudFlare

    Unsolved Performance
    23
    1 Votes
    23 Posts
    2k Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW it’s your only realistic option at this stage.

  • DownPWundefined

    error with v3 in browser console

    Solved Performance
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    168 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @DownPW it’s in relation to the response I provided above

  • Pandaundefined

    Bug in Nodebb route when clicking title

    Moved Configure
    3
    2 Votes
    3 Posts
    161 Views
    Pandaundefined

    Ah silly me, thanks for finding that!

  • Pandaundefined

    SEO and Nodebb

    Performance
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    148 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda It’s the best it’s ever been to be honest. I’ve used a myriad of systems in the past - most notably, WordPress, and then Flarum (which for SEO, was absolutely dire - they never even had SEO out of the box, and relied on a third party extension to do it), and NodeBB easily fares the best - see below example

    https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asudonix.org&oq=site%3Asudonix.org&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i58j69i60l2.9039j0j3&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1

    However, this was not without significant effort on my part once I’d migrated from COM to ORG - see below posts

    https://community.nodebb.org/topic/17286/google-crawl-error-after-site-migration/17?_=1688461250365

    And also

    https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/221027803?hl=en&msgid=221464164

    It was painful to say the least - as it turns out, there was an issue in NodeBB core that prevented spiders from getting to content, which as far as I understand, is now fixed. SEO in itself is a dark art - a black box that nobody really fully understands, and it’s essentially going to boil down to one thing - “content”.

    Google’s algorithm for indexing has also changed dramatically over the years. They only now crawl content that has value, so if it believes that your site has nothing to offer, it will simply skip it.

  • Pandaundefined

    Removing blue 'moved' tag from post

    Solved Configure
    16
    3 Votes
    16 Posts
    493 Views
    Pandaundefined

    @phenomlab
    Ah, got it working!
    I reversed the CSS addition to put z index high, and then I could see another error box saying fork title must be at least 3 characters.
    So made the new fork title longer and button responded.

  • Pandaundefined

    Composer options on nodebb

    Solved Configure
    8
    3 Votes
    8 Posts
    295 Views
    phenomlabundefined

    @Panda You should be able to expose the CSS for these using F12 to get into console

    3591518c-e3a3-4ada-a43c-6b32a5e0359c-image.png

    a2b8ed46-4157-4ff2-85f0-576543380107-image.png

    That should then expose the element once selected

    89d9c545-a47a-40d1-98f4-80cf3b958e8f-image.png

    Here’s the below CSS you need based on the screenshot provided.

    .composer .formatting-bar .formatting-group li[data-format="picture-o"], .composer .formatting-bar .formatting-group li[data-format="spoiler"] { display: none; }
  • DownPWundefined

    NODEBB: Nginx error performance & High CPU

    Solved Performance
    69
    14 Votes
    69 Posts
    5k Views
    DownPWundefined

    @phenomlab

    Seems to be better with some scaling fix for redis on redis.conf. I haven’t seen the message yet since the changes I made

    # I increase it to the value of /proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn tcp-backlog 4096 # I'm uncommenting because it can slow down Redis. Uncommented by default !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #save 900 1 #save 300 10 #save 60 10000

    If you have other Redis optimizations. I take all your advice

    https://severalnines.com/blog/performance-tuning-redis/

  • DownPWundefined

    [NODEBB] Help for my custom CSS

    Solved Customisation
    193
    38 Votes
    193 Posts
    30k Views
    DownPWundefined

    OMG make sense

    Thanks dude 🙂