Skip to content

Adding fileWrite to nodebb code

Solved Configure

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice gesture, and a great way to show your appreciation 💗

  • 3 Votes
    4 Posts
    136 Views

    @crazycells said in CSS code customization for the link preview plugin:

    does OGProxy show the pdf previews as well?

    Not yet, but it could with a bit of additional code.

  • 3 Votes
    12 Posts
    206 Views

    @crazycells ah, I see. That makes sense.

  • 2 Votes
    18 Posts
    455 Views

    @Panda You’ll need to do that with js. With some quick CSS changes, it looks like this

    d619844f-fbfe-4cf1-a283-6b7364f6bf18-image.png

    The colour choice is still really hard on the eye, but at least you can now read the text

  • Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    146 Views

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • 3 Votes
    16 Posts
    490 Views

    @phenomlab
    Ah, got it working!
    I reversed the CSS addition to put z index high, and then I could see another error box saying fork title must be at least 3 characters.
    So made the new fork title longer and button responded.

  • NodeBB v3 Quick reply

    Solved Configure
    4
    2 Votes
    4 Posts
    171 Views

    here is the link: https://app.transifex.com/nodebb/nodebb/translate/#tr

  • NodeBB: Consent page

    Solved Configure
    16
    4 Votes
    16 Posts
    559 Views

    @DownPW I still do not see any issues.

  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    136 Views

    @mventures the swatch feature you refer to isn’t a NodeBB plugin, but a utility that I wrote that handles this. It is available for v2 (as you can see here) but I’ve stopped developing and releasing the code because it has been entirely rewritten to work for v3.

    If you’d like the code, this is possible, but you’ll need to upgrade to v3 first.