Skip to content

[NODEBB] Help for my custom CSS

Solved Customisation

Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice gesture, and a great way to show your appreciation 💗

  • MogoDB v6 to v7 upgrade

    Solved Configure
    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    73 Views

    @Panda if you used the Ubuntu PPA, I think this only goes as far as 6.x if I recall correctly.

  • 1 Votes
    3 Posts
    148 Views

    @phenomlab yes, it is 🙂 thanks a lot…

  • Upgrade issues

    Solved Configure
    2
    2 Votes
    2 Posts
    138 Views

    Use this code

    git fetch # Grab the latest code from the NodeBB repository git checkout v3.x git reset --hard origin/v3.x

    And you will have the latest version without specifying it

    https://docs.nodebb.org/configuring/upgrade/

  • Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    151 Views

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • 5 Votes
    2 Posts
    213 Views

    Nice. Very good tips Mark 😁

  • 1 Votes
    2 Posts
    273 Views

    @Sala This should look better

    .sidenav .navbar-brand { padding-top: 0.5rem; padding-bottom: 0.5rem; }

    e5cec20e-be36-4ee8-9129-fd11ad4656ac-image.png

    You can increase the top and bottom padding by increasing the values above.

  • 0 Votes
    6 Posts
    538 Views

    @cagatay You should ask in the NodeBB forums. Perhaps reference this post

    https://discuss.flarum.org/d/23066-who-read

  • 0 Votes
    15 Posts
    691 Views

    @DownPW That was going to be my next suggestion 🙂